Monday, 10 January 2011

Manager jailed for $20,700 criminal breach of trust (Casino related crime)

straitstimes.com, dated 10 January 2011, Monday

Reported by Elena Chong
============================================

A LOCAL shoe-chain executive who gambled away $20,733 from the outlet's daily sales collections was jailed for nine months on Monday for criminal breach of trust.

Michael Ng, 25, an Indonesian, was working at Charles & Keith's Suntec outlet at Temasek Boulevard when he committed the offence between Sept 13 and 24 last year.

The court heard that he was supposed to bank in the daily sales of the company's outlet but instead used the money to feed off his gambling habit.

He would take the daily proceeds and 'try his luck'' at the casinos. But he lost all the money.

He could have been jailed for up to 15 years and fined.

Wednesday, 5 January 2011

Casino exclusion process now faster

The Straits Times, Jan 4, 2011

Casino exclusion process now faster

By Ng Kai Ling

FAMILIES will now be able to get their relatives with gambling problems barred from casinos, just two weeks after they apply for it.


This comes after changes to the application process by the National Council of Problem Gambling (NCPG).


Acting on feedback that six weeks was too long, the NCPG has more than halved the processing time by ensuring that a hearing date is set for each case once someone contacts the council for a family exclusion order.


Earlier, families and subjects of the exclusion order would have to go through counselling, and have a detailed 25-page report on their circumstances submitted before a hearing date could be set.


This part of the process is often the most time-consuming, said Tanjong Pagar Family Service Centre senior counsellor Charles Lee, because problem gamblers can be uncooperative and delay the hearing by skipping appointments.


With the new process, a hearing date is set even before the counselling is done, and regardless of whether the gambler turns up or not, a decision can be made based on the family's input.

If the application is approved, an exclusion order is issued immediately after the hearing. Following which, case workers can recommend follow-up counselling sessions. Families can also ask for them after the order is given.


The NCPG started testing out the process early last month after frustrated families complained about the time it took to have a family exclusion order issued.


One family member, Mr Richard Ho, wrote to the Straits Times Forum page on Nov 27 last year, saying that the process to get a ban on one of his relatives was too bureaucratic and long.

NCPG chairman Lim Hock San said a lot of waiting time has been cut by having the counselling session and hearing on the same day.


'We want to help families better manage the tensions and conflict from an application for family exclusion. Yet, we have also learnt that families feel an urgent need to stop problem gambling.'

Mr Lee recalled a recent case of a husband gambling away the daily $30 maintenance money he was supposed to give his wife and three kids.


'In this case, the faster approval definitely helped as we could stop the man from gambling away more money,' he said.


To meet the shorter timeline, the NCPG has deployed more manpower, starting last month.

So far, the council has received 410 applications for family exclusion orders since April 2009. As of Dec 31 last year, 297 problem gamblers have been slapped with family exclusion orders.

Unlike cases of voluntary self-exclusion, where gamblers get themselves banned from casinos with immediate effect, family exclusion orders take longer to process.


Mr Lee said applications often get delayed because the parties involved would postpone their counselling appointments or simply not show up.


'Now they get a hearing date immediately and a letter from the NCPG informing them about it. They treat it more seriously. They know that it is important and that it is a time for them to tell their side of the story,' he added.

Friday, 26 November 2010

PRIMARY SCHOOL LEAVING EXAMINATION RESULTS: Rosyth boy tops PSLE

Info Source: www.straitstimes.com dated 2010-11-25

ALEX Tan Kian Hye of Rosyth School is the top Primary School Leaving Examination (PSLE) pupil this year with a score of 282.

Fu Wan Ying from Tao Nan School had the second highest score of 279.

The top Malay pupil is Aquilah Dariah Mohd Zulkarnain, of Coral Primary School who scored 278, while the top Indian pupil is Muhammad Hameem, of Henry Park Primary School with a score of 274, and the top Eurasian pupil is Lendermann Monika Jiz-xin, of CHIJ Our Lady Queen of Peace, with a 269 score.

A total of 45,049 Primary 6 pupils sat for the PSLE this year. Of these, 43,826 pupils, or 97.3 per cent, can go on to secondary school.

Among the others, 63 per cent are eligible for the Express course, 22.1 per cent for the Normal (Academic) and 11.7 per cent for the Normal (Technical) course.

There are 1,223 pupils or 2.7 per cent who did not qualify for secondary school. These pupils can choose to apply to Assumption Pathway School (APS) or NorthLight School (NLS) based on recommendations of their primary school principals, or spend another year in Primary 6 to consolidate their learning.

Tuesday, 26 October 2010

NEA website has all info on dengue

The following letter is form the ST Forum of the Straits Times dated 25 October 2010, Monday.

WE THANK Mr Lim Hai Leong for his interest in dengue control and sharing his ideas with us ('Dengue cases: Review the reporting of these numbers, as interpreting them can influence how we tackle the problem'; Oct 13)

The National Environment Agency (NEA) publishes the locality of dengue fever cases on its website to alert residents in the area to rid their premises of breeding grounds. Information on what residents can do to protect themselves and family members from dengue fever is also available on the website.

We agree with the writer that information such as the number of people who have recovered from the disease or the disease infection rate is useful, but more so for disease monitoring and control purposes by the authorities.

The NEA has two key criteria for clustering of dengue cases. A dengue cluster is formed when two or more dengue cases occur within 14 days from the onset of their fever and the likely places of infection are within 150m of each other.

A cluster will be closed only when no new case is reported after 14 days from the onset of fever of the last dengue case.

The clustering of cases is important as it helps in vector control management. We assure Mr Lim that our inspections on the ground at Telok Blangah extend beyond the cluster radius by 50m to 100m. All common areas frequented by dengue cases in the cluster are also inspected to eliminate possible sources of infection.

Thus far, no fatality has been reported in these two clusters and one of the clusters has closed.

S. Satish Appoo
Director Environmental Health Department
National Environment Agency

School closure: Help S'poreans who have no protection


The following letter is from ST Forum of the Straits Times dated 25 October 2010, Monday.

MY SON was one of the students affected by the closure of the School of Applied Studies ('Private school closes suddenly'; last Friday).

At a meeting last Wednesday evening, the school's chief executive and representatives from the Council for Private Education (CPE) and a bank had briefed students and parents on the situation.

I hope the CPE and the relevant authorities would resolve some of the issues raised and ensure that the promises made by the school's CEO are kept.

The Straits Times report quoted a CPE spokesman as saying that the private school was working with the insurance providers and escrow banks to work out how much money would be returned to students.

There are a number of Singaporean students who paid their fees last year before the implementation of the fee protection system, and they are left with no recourse.

One such student, the child of a single parent, paid $32,000 (total sum for courses leading to a degree) after taking a bank loan. Now, the parent does not know how to get the remaining fees back, and the student has just a diploma.

Another Singaporean student who paid $36,000 last year is also not protected under any system.

When the new fee insurance system was implemented, such students should have been provided protection. Will anyone be punished for this oversight?

Steps should also be taken to improve the new protection system and plug its loopholes.
Upon checking my son's insurance certificate sent to us after he had completed two semesters, I noted that the limit of indemnity for the fee paid had been under-declared by the school.


Lim Siew Imm (Ms)

Sunday, 26 September 2010

Top private tutors raking in big bucks (by Radha Basu, Senior Correspondent )

The following report is from the Sunday Times dated 26 September 2010.

Many in tuition- hungry Singapore say that incomes are up by at least 30%

By Radha Basu, Senior Correspondent

When Ms Janice Chuah first started her private tuition classes in January last year, she had only five pupils.

She earned $1,000 a month.

Her pupil base has since grown tenfold - and she now earns up to $15,000 a month teaching maths to primary school pupils.

Ms Chuah, 36, who has won several awards from the Ministry of Education, had quit teaching in a primary school to become a private tutor. She wanted to spend more time with her three young boys, aged between three and nine.

She now puts in half her previous 40-hour work week while earning more than double her previous salary.

When she quit her job, she was prepared to give up a paid employee's perks like bonuses, medical benefits and annual leave.

'I was willing to initially sacrifice income for more flexibility,' she said. 'I've been lucky to marry work with passion, have flexible hours, and earn a respectable income.'

She has since also registered her own private education centre, employing five tutors. She hopes to list the company on the stock exchange some day. 'The sky is the limit for me,' she said, beaming.

Indeed, with parents in Singapore spending $820 million on private tuition in 2008 - nearly double that a decade earlier - private tutors, especially those in the top league, are raking in big bucks.

Half a dozen well-established tutors The Sunday Times spoke to have all seen incomes rise by at least 30 per cent over the past couple of years.

It is a business that seems to be recession-proof, with some tutors earning upwards of $1 million a year, said Mr Tong Yee, a former junior college teacher.

Mr Tong is one of the founders of School of Thought, an education consultancy that provides affordable tuition and which also aims to see private tuition done away with, as schools improve on their teaching methods.

'I reckon there are at least 10 top tutors who earn upwards of $1 million a year,' he said. He estimates that there could be another 25 earning more than $200,000.

An economics tutor he knows, for instance, coaches 70 students during each weekly session. With six such sessions, he has at least 420 students. This person, Mr Tong said, earns around $55,000 a month.

Such tutors rarely have to advertise; students mostly hear about them by word of mouth.
The Sunday Times understands that this discreet method - in which they typically get paid in cash - also means they are not on the taxman's radar.

But one super tutor who is not shy about his income is Mr Phang Yu Hon, 43, who teaches physics to upper secondary and junior college students.

Mr Phang, a former Mindef research engineer with a first-class honours degree in electrical engineering from the National University of Singapore, earned more than $522,000 after expenses last year - or more than $40,000 a month.

He declared all this and paid $85,000 in taxes. This year, he expects to earn between $600,000 and $700,000.

When he began giving tuition full-time in 1997, he earned less than $10,000 in his first year. 'It was a big pay cut and people thought I was wasting my education,' Mr Phang said. 'But I liked to teach and wanted to control my own destiny.'

From just eight students at the end of 1997, he now has 200. Fees for secondary school students start at $320 a month; those in junior college pay $340 upwards.

Ms Celine Loi's business is another success story. The maths tutor's income has doubled since she was featured in a Sunday Times piece on super tutors in 2008.

The NUS maths graduate declined to say exactly how much she earns, but her takings have increased by a 'six-digit' figure in recent years.

Ms Loi, 35, claims that she is able to help weak students attain good grades in maths. She has around 160 students currently and another 40 on a wait list.

Mr Kelvin Ong, meanwhile, has carved out a niche - in tutoring children who want, or whose parents want them, to get into the Gifted Education Programme.

Mr Ong, 35, runs his own academic enrichment company AristoCare.

He takes in only 10 pupils every year, works just 32 hours a week, but earns 30 per cent more than what he did as a gifted education teacher at a well-known boys' school.

But he is quick to advise aspiring tutors that not everyone makes it to the top league, that they should consider the high stakes and 'big stresses' involved.

'There are no bonuses,' he said.

'Unlike the schools, you can lose all your students if you don't deliver good results,' he added.
Indeed, the vast majority of tutors here are unlikely to earn anywhere near six figures.

It is difficult to assess median incomes of private tutors, given the unregulated nature of the business. But at some private tuition centres, the pay for full-time tutors starts at $1,800 a month.

Untested tutors aiming for the top league have to prove themselves first, especially as appraisals in many tuition centres are linked to how students perform.

And many home tutors are dropped the moment students don't perform.

Ms Chuah said there is a 'preconceived notion' that tutoring is easy work.

'To be a good teacher, I need to make the effort to understand what and why my students don't understand. I must have the patience to explain to them until they do, even for the zillionth time,' she said. 'And that's not easy at all.'

Friday, 20 August 2010

Demand (of private tuition) raises questions about effectiveness of remedials

The following is from ST Forum of the STraits Times dated 19 August 2010

ST Forum

Aug 19, 2010
Demand raises questions about effectiveness of remedials

IN RECENT years, there has been a growing emphasis on work-life balance. This is much welcome, but efforts seem targeted at working adults.

I think we have overlooked the same need for our young.

Our children not only attend school, but they must also stay back for project work, a host of activities other than co-curricular programmes and, on top of these, remedial classes.

Students, especially those in upper secondary, stay back as late as 5pm or 6pm for compulsory remedial classes for different subjects on different days of the week. And when they finally get home, many have to rush through dinner as they probably still have homework to complete, tests to revise for and maybe projects to work on.

Besides, much as some people would like to deny it, private tuition is almost a necessity nowadays.

This insatiable need for tuition should set school managements thinking: Are the remedial programmes effective?

We need to make time for students to wind down, recharge, reflect and relax. They need time for family and friends.

We cannot have a system in which academic excellence always prevails.

For the many students who are of average calibre, this kills passion for learning anything at all, not to mention the adverse effects on their self-esteem, and relationships with friends and family.

I hope the Education Ministry and Ministry of Community Development, Youth and Sports will study the issue and craft policies and programmes that complement one another. This can be done by having the needs of our young in mind.

Constance Lee (Ms)